De Iside et Osiride is the Greek philosopher Plutarch's own retelling and philosophical interpretation of the Egyptian myth of Isis and Osiris, written in the late first or early second century CE, presented here in the standard Loeb Classical Library edition with Frank Cole Babbitt's translation facing the Greek text. Its authority as a primary source of Greco Roman engagement with Egyptian religion is well established, the Loeb series is the standard scholarly format for classical texts in translation. Its limit is exactly what the text itself is, a Greek outsider's philosophical reading of the myth written many centuries after Egyptian religion's height, shaped by Plutarch's own Middle Platonist concerns, so it should be read alongside native Egyptian textual sources for the myth's earlier, undistorted form rather than as that form itself.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Plutarch's De Iside et Osiride, a Greco-Roman primary account and interpretation of the Isis and Osiris myth, in the standard Loeb Classical Library translation. Written centuries after the tradition's height by an outside Greek philosopher, so read alongside native Egyptian textual sources for the myth's earlier form. NotesPlutarch's De Iside et Osiride, a primary Greco-Roman text recounting and interpreting the myth of Isis and Osiris, in the standard Loeb translation. Use for the content of this ancient Greek account of the Isis-Osiris myth; a Greek philosopher's interpretive retelling written centuries after the tradition's height, not a native Egyptian primary source, so it should be read alongside Egyptian textual sources for the myth's earlier form.
Citation
AuthorPlutarch; Frank Cole Babbitt (translator)
PublisherLoeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press
Publication Year1936
URLhttps://archive.org/details/plutarch-isis-osiris-loeb
Source Typeprimary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Franks directly: "De Iside et Osiride is the Greek philosopher Plutarch's own retelling and philosophical interpretation of the Egyptian myth of Isis and Osiris, written in the late first or early second century CE..."
Isis, Deities This source names Isis directly: "interpretation of the Egyptian myth of Isis and Osiris, written in the late first or early second century CE, presented here in the standard Loeb Classical Library edition with Frank Cole Babbitt's..."
This source names Osiris directly: "of the Egyptian myth of Isis and Osiris, written in the late first or early second century CE, presented here in the standard Loeb Classical Library edition with Frank Cole Babbitt's translation..."
Claims Backed By This Source (104 claims)
This source backs 104 claims across the atlas. As facts: 59 well-attested. As cited relationships: 33 holds. Plus 12 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Figures, 59 claims: 31 well-attested, 23 holds, 5 general references.
- Myths & Sacred Narratives, 14 claims: 9 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 11 claims: 8 well-attested, 3 holds.
- Incense, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Deities, 5 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Numbers, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Hymns & Liturgical Texts, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
59Myths & Sacred Narratives
Holds
33Myths & Sacred Narratives
General References
12Myths & Sacred Narratives
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.