Home›Sources›Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 256SourcesMultani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 256Citation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 256." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/multani-v-commission-scolaire-marguerite-bourgeoys-2006-scc-6-2006-1-s-c-r-256.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 256. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/multani-v-commission-scolaire-marguerite-bourgeoys-2006-scc-6-2006-1-s-c-r-256Copy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-multani-v-commission-scolaire-marguerite, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 256}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/multani-v-commission-scolaire-marguerite-bourgeoys-2006-scc-6-2006-1-s-c-r-256}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXMultani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, the Supreme Court of Canada's own 2006 ruling, held that an absolute school prohibition on a Sikh student wearing a kirpan infringed freedom of religion and was not justified under the Charter's limitation clause. Its strength is that it is the Court's own opinion, the primary record of what it actually held. Its limit is that it rules on the specific school policy before it rather than offering a general account of kirpan practice across Sikh communities, which needs separate sources.FactsSourcesClaims Backed By This Source (12 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsCitationAuthorWell-attestedSupreme Court of CanadaPublisherWell-attestedSupreme Court of CanadaPublication YearWell-attested2006URLWell-attestedhttps://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2006/2006scc6/2006scc6.htmlSource TypeWell-attestedCase lawAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested1Reliability tier 1: the Supreme Court of Canada's own opinion, the primary record of what it actually held.NotesWell-attestedHeld that an absolute prohibition on a Sikh student wearing a kirpan at school infringed freedom of religion and was not saved under section 1 of the Charter.SourcesMultani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 256tier 1Supreme Court of Canada, Supreme Court of Canada, 2006View the SourceClaims Backed By This Source (12 claims)This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicSources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.Religions, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.Well-attested10ReligionsSikhismSacred Objects & Ritual ItemsKirpanSourcesMultani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, 2006 SCC 6, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 256General References2ReligionsSikhismSacred Objects & Ritual ItemsKirpanComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year