John Henry Newman wrote An Essay on the Development of Christian Doctrine in 1845, in the months before his own reception into the Catholic Church from Anglicanism, and revised it in 1878 as a Catholic. It argues that a true doctrine can unfold and articulate itself more fully over time, under the church's own fidelity to what it already held, without that unfolding making it a novelty, using the image of a seed that is not less itself for growing into a tree. The essay became the founding text of the theory of doctrinal development and the standard reference for the argument that later, fuller statements of Catholic teaching, including papal primacy and jurisdiction, are a legitimate growth from an original deposit of faith rather than an invention.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
John Henry Newman's own 1845 essay, written on the eve of his reception into the Catholic Church and revised by him in 1878, is the founding text of the theory of doctrinal development and the primary source for the argument attributed to it. It is a theologian's own argument rather than an official Church document, so it is authoritative for what Newman himself argued and influential for later Catholic theology, not a binding magisterial statement in its own right. Citation
AuthorJohn Henry Newman
PublisherJames Toovey, London (first edition, 1845); Newman issued a revised edition in 1878 after his reception into the Catholic Church
Publication Year1845
Source Typeprimary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Anglicanism directly: "into the Catholic Church from Anglicanism, and revised it in 1878 as a Catholic."
Claims Backed By This Source (8 claims)
This source backs 8 claims across the atlas. As facts: 6 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.