Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Non-Muslims in the Early Islamic Empire: From Surrender to Coexistence

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Milka Levy-Rubin is a scholar of early Islamic history, and this Cambridge University Press book is her scholarly study of the legal status of non-Muslims under the early Islamic empire, covering the jizya poll tax and the Pact of Umar that formalized dhimmi status. Its strength is close use of the earliest available legal and documentary sources to reconstruct how this framework actually formed, rather than reading later, more developed jurisprudence back into the earliest period. Its limit is exactly that early focus, it is a study of the formation of this legal framework specifically, not of how the later legal schools developed or altered that doctrine in subsequent centuries, so a claim about later Islamic legal practice needs a source addressing that later period.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Cambridge University Press as Milka Levy-Rubin's academic study of non-Muslims in the early Islamic empire, peer reviewed university press scholarship.
Notes
Milka Levy-Rubin's scholarly study of the legal status of non-Muslims in the early Islamic empire, covering the jizya tax and the Pact of Umar. Use for established historical facts about this early legal framework and its formation; a focused study of the early period specifically, not a source on how these same legal schools' doctrine evolved in later centuries.
Citation
Author
Milka Levy-Rubin
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
2011
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Umar, Figures

This source names Umar directly: "the jizya poll tax and the Pact of Umar that formalized dhimmi status."

Claims Backed By This Source (31 claims)

This source backs 31 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds, 1 held Differently. Plus 9 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Schools of Religious Law, 8 claims: 3 holds, 1 held Differently, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Empires & Polities, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Doctrines, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Religious Legal Instruments, 2 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Religious Legal Instruments

Held Differently

1

Schools of Religious Law

General References

9

Doctrines

Figures

Religious Legal Instruments

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.