Sources
Nostradamus (Wikipedia)
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The English Wikipedia article on Nostradamus, read directly for its own "Scholarly rebuttal" section, which surveys academic assessment of the quatrains generally and of the 1999 Century X.72 quatrain specifically, citing Peter Lemesurier's 2010 study by name for the finding that the verse "describes no event that commentators have succeeded in identifying either before or since, other than by twisting the words to fit whichever of the many contradictory happenings they claim as 'hits.'" Read here as a tertiary synthesis of Nostradamus scholarship, not as original research; Lemesurier's own book is separately live in this atlas as source 14420.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier3
Tier three: a crowd sourced, not independently peer reviewed encyclopedia entry, matching this atlas's established convention for a Wikipedia citation, read here for its own Scholarly rebuttal section surveying academic assessment of the quatrains. Its limit is that it is a tertiary synthesis of Nostradamus scholarship, not original research; Lemesurier's own book it cites is separately live in this atlas as its own source. NotesA tertiary encyclopedia synthesis, tiered to match this atlas's existing 59 live Wikipedia source citations, all tiered 3. Valued here for its own direct citation of Lemesurier 2010 by name and page, not as a substitute for reading Lemesurier's own book, which is separately live in this atlas as source 14420.
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors
PublisherWikimedia Foundation
Publication Year2026
URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostradamus
Source Typereference
Claims Backed By This Source (10 claims)
This source backs 10 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Prophecies, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.