Nora K. Chadwick and Victor Zhirmunsky were specialists in oral epic tradition, and this Cambridge University Press book is their comparative academic study of the oral epic traditions of Central Asian Turkic and Mongolic peoples, examining shared structural features and historical connections across a wide range of individual epic cycles. Its strength is genuinely comparative scholarship built on real command of the individual epic traditions being compared, rather than a survey assembled at second hand from other scholars' summaries. Its limit is its age relative to a still active field of Central Asian epic scholarship, later fieldwork and textual recovery have added to and in places revised the corpus this study worked from, so a claim about one specific epic tradition's current scholarly understanding benefits from checking against more recent, tradition specific research alongside this foundational comparative study.
Facts
Citation
AuthorNora K. Chadwick and Victor Zhirmunsky
PublisherCambridge University Press
Publication Year1969
URLhttps://archive.org/details/oralepicsofcentr0000chad
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Nora Chadwick and Victor Zhirmunsky's Cambridge University Press comparative study of the oral epic traditions of Central Asian Turkic and Mongolic peoples. NotesComparative study of the oral epic traditions of Central Asian Turkic and Mongolic peoples.
Claims Backed By This Source (59 claims)
This source backs 59 claims across the atlas. As facts: 42 well-attested. As cited relationships: 11 holds. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Other Writings, 30 claims: 20 well-attested, 7 holds, 3 general references.
- Articles, 14 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Languages, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 3 holds, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.