Sources
Proclus: Five Hymns
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Proclus's Five Hymns, in Thomas Taylor's 1792 English translation read here from a public-domain digital edition, presents the fifth century Neoplatonist philosopher Proclus's own devotional poetry addressed to various deities within his Neoplatonic theological framework. Taylor was an eighteenth century English Platonist whose translations, though dated in style, remain in wide circulation as the most accessible English versions of several minor Neoplatonic texts. Its strength is that it makes Proclus's own composed hymns, primary evidence for how a late Neoplatonist philosopher practiced devotion within his own system, available in English at all. Its limit is that Taylor's translation reflects eighteenth century English and his own idiosyncratic Platonist commitments, so a claim resting on precise wording should be checked against a modern scholarly translation where one exists rather than taken from Taylor's phrasing alone.
Facts
Citation
AuthorProclus; Thomas Taylor (translator)
PublisherPublic-domain digital edition
Publication Year1792
URLhttps://www.tertullian.org/fathers/proclus_five_hymns_01_text.htm
Source Typeprimary-text
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Thomas Taylor's 1792 translation of Proclus's Five Hymns is a period translation reflecting Taylor's own idiosyncratic Platonist commitments rather than a modern critical edition, hence the middle tier. NotesPublic-domain historical translation.
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested. As cited relationships: 6 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Prayers, 10 claims: 2 well-attested, 6 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Doctrines, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.