Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Prolegomena to the History of Israel

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Julius Wellhausen's Prolegomena is the primary formulation of the documentary hypothesis, the theory that the Torah was compiled from four earlier written sources, and this record states its real standing honestly rather than treating it as settled current scholarship: it gives the traditional Mosaic authorship position alongside Wellhausen's own theory, and states plainly that the specific four-source model as Wellhausen formulated it is no longer the consensus it once was. Its documented historical importance is as the theory's most influential formulation, the reason later biblical criticism still engages with it directly. Use it to establish what Wellhausen's own documentary hypothesis actually argued; a claim about the current scholarly consensus on Torah composition needs a more recent source alongside it.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Julius Wellhausen's foundational nineteenth-century scholarly argument for the documentary hypothesis of the Pentateuch's composition; cited as the classic statement of that critical position, alongside the traditional Mosaic authorship it argues against, noting the four-source model is no longer scholarly consensus in its original form.
Notes
The documentary hypothesis. The entry gives the traditional Mosaic position alongside it and states that the four-source model is no longer consensus.
Citation
Author
Julius Wellhausen
Publisher
Georg Reimer
Berlin; the original German edition, "Prolegomena zur Geschichte Israels".
Publication Year
1883
URL
https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/4732
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (92 claims)

This source backs 92 claims across the atlas. As facts: 54 well-attested, 6 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 29 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Scripture Portions, 69 claims: 36 well-attested, 6 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 24 general references.
  • Myths & Sacred Narratives, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Deities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.