Peter Markie wrote this Rationalism vs. Empiricism entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Its authority comes from the same editorial model that gives the Encyclopedia its standing generally, a named specialist author writing a signed, peer-reviewed entry that is then kept current through dated revisions, rather than a fixed-edition print reference that can grow stale or an anonymous crowd-edited page with no accountable author. Its limit is that as a survey entry on a very broad philosophical debate spanning centuries and many individual thinkers, it necessarily treats any one philosopher's specific position at a summary level, so a claim needing close engagement with one rationalist or empiricist's own argument is better served by a focused study of that philosopher.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Published as a signed specialist entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, maintained by Stanford's Metaphysics Research Lab under an editorial board; a named academic specialist's continually reviewed reference entry, but a survey encyclopedia entry rather than a full peer reviewed monograph, hence the middle tier. NotesPeter Markie's Rationalism vs. Empiricism entry in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; a peer-reviewed, continuously revised scholarly reference, not a fixed-edition monograph.
Citation
AuthorPeter Markie
PublisherMetaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University
Publication Year2004
URLhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rationalism-empiricism/
Source Typereference
Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)
This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 28 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Philosophical Schools, 17 claims: 13 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.