Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Ratnagotravibhaga (Uttaratantra Shastra)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Ratnagotravibhaga, also known as the Uttaratantra Shastra, attributed to Maitreya with a commentary by Asanga, is the classical Indian Buddhist treatise that systematised the buddha-nature, or tathagatagarbha, teaching, and it is the text at the centre of the later Tibetan rangtong-shentong dispute over how its positive language about buddha-nature is properly read. As a primary scriptural and philosophical text, it is authoritative for what the treatise itself actually says, which grounds both sides of that later interpretive dispute. It records the classical Indian source text, not any one side's later reading of it, so a claim about how a specific tradition interprets it needs that tradition's own commentarial source alongside this one.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The Ratnagotravibhaga is the classical Indian Buddhist primary treatise itself that systematised the buddha-nature teaching, treated at the top tier as the primary scriptural and philosophical source authoritative for what the treatise itself actually says.
Notes
The classical Indian treatise systematising the buddha-nature (tathagatagarbha) teaching, and the text at the centre of the later rangtong-shentong dispute over how its positive language is to be read.
Citation
Author
Attributed to Maitreya, with commentary by Asanga
Source Type
primary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Maitreya, Deities

This source names Maitreya directly: "Uttaratantra Shastra, attributed to Maitreya with a commentary by Asanga, is the classical Indian Buddhist treatise that systematised the buddha-nature, or tathagatagarbha, teaching, and it is the..."

Source Ratnagotravibhaga (Uttaratantra Shastra)Attributed to Maitreya, with commentary by Asanga
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)

This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 7 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Doctrines, 3 claims: 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Denominations, 1 claims: 1 general references.

General References

4

Beliefs & Restrictions

Denominations

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.