Marlene Laruelle is a scholar of Central Asian politics and religion, and this is her peer reviewed article in the academic journal Central Asian Survey, examining the modern revival of Tengrism, the traditional sky god religion of the Turkic and Mongolic steppe, as it has been taken up in nationalist movements in Central Asia and Tatarstan. Its strength is a specific, argued thesis, that this modern Tengrist revival is substantially an invented tradition serving contemporary nationalist purposes rather than an unbroken continuation of pre modern steppe religion, laid out alongside adherents' own rejection of that reading. Its limit is that this is one scholar's interpretive framework applied to a live, contested and still developing movement, so a practitioner's own self understanding of the revival, which the article itself acknowledges differs from its argument, is a necessary counterpart rather than something this article settles.
Facts
Citation
AuthorMarlene Laruelle
PublisherCentral Asian Survey
Publication Year2007
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/02634930701517433
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
A peer reviewed journal article giving the invention of tradition reading of the modern Tengrist revival in Central Asia and Tatarstan, presented alongside adherents' own rejection of that reading. NotesThe invention-of-tradition reading of the modern Tengrist revival, given alongside adherents' rejection of it.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Asia directly: "Laruelle is a scholar of Central Asian politics and religion, and this is her peer reviewed article in the academic journal Central Asian Survey, examining the modern revival of Tengrism, the..."
Claims Backed By This Source (51 claims)
This source backs 51 claims across the atlas. As facts: 37 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 8 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Religions, 13 claims: 12 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sacred Objects & Ritual Items, 10 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 holds, 3 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Doctrines, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Deities, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Articles, 4 claims: 4 well-attested.
- Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
37Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Holds
5Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
General References
8Sacred Objects & Ritual Items
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.