J. Lowell Lewis's Ring of Liberation, Deceptive Discourse in Brazilian Capoeira, published by the University of Chicago Press in 1992, is an anthropological study of capoeira built on Lewis's own fieldwork training within the Brazilian martial art and game, examining how its combination of music, dance, ritual and combat produces a deliberately ambiguous, deceptive style of communication between players. Its strength is participant fieldwork of the demanding kind capoeira requires, Lewis trained inside the practice rather than only observing it, giving the analysis of its bodily and performative logic a grounding an outside observer's account would lack. Its limit is that it is one anthropologist's theoretical reading of capoeira through a specific period and set of teachers in the early 1990s, and capoeira's own practice, history and regional schools have continued to develop and be debated since, so a claim about capoeira's present day diversity or its African versus Brazilian origins needs sources engaging that ongoing scholarly discussion directly.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
J. Lowell Lewis's Ring of Liberation, Deceptive Discourse in Brazilian Capoeira, published by the University of Chicago Press in 1992, is a peer reviewed anthropological monograph grounded in fieldwork, treated at the top tier. NotesScholarly ethnographic study of discourse and deception in Brazilian capoeira.
Citation
AuthorJ. Lowell Lewis
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
Publication Year1992
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Chicago directly: "published by the University of Chicago Press in 1992, is an anthropological study of capoeira built on Lewis's own fieldwork training within the Brazilian martial art and game, examining how its..."
Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)
This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 connected. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Practices, 12 claims: 6 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.