Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Ritual: Perspectives and Dimensions

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Catherine Bell was a scholar of ritual studies, and this Oxford University Press book is her standard academic survey of ritual as an analytic category, and its chapter setting out the six basic genres of ritual action, rites of passage, calendrical rites, rites of exchange and communion, rites of affliction, feasting, fasting and festivals, and political rites, is widely used as a comparative framework across the field of religious studies. Its strength is synthesizing a large and often theoretically fragmented body of prior ritual scholarship into one usable analytic structure, tested against ritual examples drawn from many different traditions rather than built from a single case. Its limit is that as a general analytic framework, it necessarily simplifies the specific internal logic of any one tradition's own ritual system, so it should be used as a comparative lens rather than a substitute for that tradition's own account of its rites.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The standard scholarly survey of ritual as an analytic category, from a university press.
Notes
The standard survey of ritual as an analytic category. Its "Basic Genres of Ritual Action" sets out the six genres, rites of passage, calendrical rites, rites of exchange and communion, rites of affliction, feasting/fasting/festivals, political rites, used here as the comparative frame for the ritual subcategories.
Citation
Author
Catherine Bell
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1997
URL
https://archive.org/details/ritualperspectiv0000bell_h3n0
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (36 claims)

This source backs 36 claims across the atlas. As facts: 29 well-attested. Plus 7 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Subcategories, 20 claims: 15 well-attested, 5 general references.
  • Categories, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.