Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Rome's Vestal Virgins: A Study of Rome's Vestal Priestesses in the Late Republic and Early Principate

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Robin Lorsch Wildfang is a classicist, and this Routledge book is her academic study of the Vestal Virgins of the late Roman Republic and early Principate, covering their selection, consecration and role within the Collegium Pontificum, the college of priests that oversaw Roman state religion. Its strength is focused, well sourced treatment of a specific and well documented period of Vestal practice, working from the Roman literary and legal sources for how the priesthood actually functioned in this window. Its limit is exactly that chronological focus, the source record itself notes it: the study concentrates on the late Republic and early Principate specifically, so a claim about earlier archaic Roman Vestal practice, or about the priesthood's later imperial history, needs a source with a wider chronological range than this one covers.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Robin Lorsch Wildfang's scholarly study of the Vestal Virgins in the late Roman Republic and early Principate, covering their selection, consecration and role within the Collegium Pontificum; its focus is that period specifically, so a claim about earlier or later Roman practice may need a source with a wider chronological range.
Notes
Robin Lorsch Wildfang's scholarly study of the Vestal Virgins of the late Roman Republic and early Principate, covering their selection, consecration and role within the Collegium Pontificum. Use for established historical facts about the Vestals in this period; its focus is the late Republic and early Principate specifically, so a claim about earlier or later Roman practice may need a source with a wider chronological range.
Citation
Author
Robin Lorsch Wildfang
Publisher
Routledge, London and New York
Publication Year
2006
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (64 claims)

This source backs 64 claims across the atlas. As facts: 43 well-attested, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 10 holds. Plus 10 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 15 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 open question, 5 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 13 claims: 11 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Organizations, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Religious Roles & Titles, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Rituals, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Cultures, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Holidays & Festivals, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Open question

1

Historical Figures

Holds

10

Historical Figures

Holidays & Festivals

Open Questions

General References

10

Historical Figures

Holidays & Festivals

Open Questions

Religious Roles & Titles

Sacred Sites

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.