Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Rotten Tomatoes, "Marley" (2012) Critic Reviews

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

An aggregated critic review page, read directly for this entry. Its strength is that it collects and quotes many named, individually attributed critic reviews in one place with a summary score. Its limit is that the aggregator itself renders no independent critical judgment; each opinion cited here belongs to the individual named critic quoted, not to the atlas or to Rotten Tomatoes as a publication.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Reliability tier 2: an aggregated critic review page on Rotten Tomatoes, compiling professional film criticism rather than being itself a single named reviewer's account, useful for a broad reception summary.
Notes
Checked at its exact URL. The page shows a 95 percent Tomatometer score across 110 reviews at the time this entry was written. Named critics quoted include Radheyan Simonpillai of NOW Toronto, Brad Wheeler of the Globe and Mail, Peter Howell of the Toronto Star, Nicolas Delgadillo of Discussing Film and Michael Calleri of the Niagara Gazette, each independently attributed on the page rather than summarized by the aggregator.
Citation
Publisher
Rotten Tomatoes
URL
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/marley
Source Type
news feature
Claims Backed By This Source (10 claims)

This source backs 10 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Screen Works, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.