Home›Sources›Rotten Tomatoes, "The Other Conquest," aggregated critic reviewsSourcesRotten Tomatoes, "The Other Conquest," aggregated critic reviewsCitation FormatsGeneral ReferenceGeneral Reference Citation TextDivinity Atlas. "Rotten Tomatoes, "The Other Conquest," aggregated critic reviews." Accessed August 30, 2026. https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/rotten-tomatoes-the-other-conquest-critic-reviews.Copy General ReferenceAPA StyleAPA Style Citation TextDivinity Atlas. (n.d.). Rotten Tomatoes, "The Other Conquest," aggregated critic reviews. Retrieved August 30, 2026, from https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/rotten-tomatoes-the-other-conquest-critic-reviewsCopy APA StyleBibTeXBibTeX Citation Text@misc{divinityatlas-rotten-tomatoes-the-other-conquest-aggre, author = {Divinity Atlas}, title = {Rotten Tomatoes, "The Other Conquest," aggregated critic reviews}, year = {2026}, url = {https://divinity.interactivelion.com/sources/rotten-tomatoes-the-other-conquest-critic-reviews}, note = {Accessed August 30, 2026} }Copy BibTeXThe review aggregation site's page for the film, checked at its exact URL. Its strength is that it names specific professional critics at named daily newspapers and their published assessments, rather than an anonymous audience score. Its limit is that it is an aggregator rather than the original review text, so quotes are cited as reported there rather than independently re-verified at each newspaper's own archive.FactsClaims Backed By This Source (11 claims)Comments (0)Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)FactsAssessmentReliability TierWell-attested2Rotten Tomatoes' aggregated critic page for The Other Conquest, the middle tier reflecting that it names specific professional critics at named daily newspapers and their published assessments rather than an anonymous audience score. Its limit is that it is an aggregator rather than the original review text, so a quote it reports is cited as reported there rather than independently re-verified at each newspaper's own archive.NotesWell-attestedChecked at its exact URL. The page records an 85 percent critic score across 13 reviews. Named critics include Kevin Thomas of the Los Angeles Times, who called it a dazzling vision of the birth of a uniquely Mexican religion through the fusion of Catholic and Aztec belief; David Elliott of the San Diego Union-Tribune, who described a grand mural of trauma exploring how masters and vassals together forged the hot core of Mexican Catholicism; and Marjorie Baumgarten of the Austin Chronicle, who called it a marvelous vision, at once spectacle, history lesson and psychological drama.CitationPublisherWell-attestedRotten TomatoesURLWell-attestedhttps://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_other_conquestSource TypeWell-attestednews featureClaims Backed By This Source (11 claims)This source backs 11 claims across the atlas. As facts: 8 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.Disposition By TopicSources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.Screen Works, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.Articles, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.Well-attested8ArticlesWhat Four Named Critics Saw in a Forced ConversionScreen WorksThe Other Conquest (1999 Film)SourcesRotten Tomatoes, "The Other Conquest," aggregated critic reviewsHolds1Screen WorksThe Other Conquest (1999 Film)General References2ArticlesWhat Four Named Critics Saw in a Forced ConversionScreen WorksThe Other Conquest (1999 Film)Comments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.View At A Past YearThe atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.Show This Year