Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

Sacred Geometry: Philosophy and Practice

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Robert Lawlor's Sacred Geometry, Philosophy and Practice, published by Thames and Hudson in 1982 as part of their Art and Imagination series, surveys geometric constructions found across ancient architecture and art, from Egyptian temples to Gothic cathedrals, and argues these proportions encode a deliberate philosophical and cosmological system rather than arising by accident or convention. Its strength is the sheer range of historical and cross cultural geometric examples it assembles into one visually rich reference, useful for the descriptive content of specific constructions and proportions across traditions. Its limit is that Lawlor writes as an advocate for sacred geometry as a coherent, intentionally transmitted ancient philosophy, a position mainstream art historians and archaeologists treat with considerably more skepticism than the book itself does, so a claim asserting that a specific ancient builder deliberately encoded a particular symbolic geometry, rather than that the geometry can be observed in the structure, needs independent historical evidence beyond this book's own interpretive framework.

Facts
Citation
Author
Robert Lawlor
Publisher
Thames and Hudson
1982, in the Art and Imagination series (ISBN 0-500-81030-3), per the publisher's own catalogue.
Publication Year
1982
Year of the Thames and Hudson edition named alongside its publisher.
Source Type
reference
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Robert Lawlor's Sacred Geometry, Philosophy and Practice, published by Thames and Hudson in 1982, is a trade press survey written as an advocate for sacred geometry as a coherent, intentionally transmitted ancient philosophy rather than an independent peer reviewed academic study, hence the middle tier.
Notes
Standard modern introduction to sacred geometry and the Platonic solids.
Claims Backed By This Source (20 claims)

This source backs 20 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 5 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Geometry, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Disciplines, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.