A combined citation covering Wikipedia's article on Salafistes and Maria Flood's peer reviewed article "Critics and controversy: the reception of Salafistes (2016) in France," published in Studies in French Cinema and including an interview with co-director Francois Margolin. Their strength is that the peer reviewed article specifically examines the film's divided critical reception and the French government's censorship debate, corroborated by contemporaneous news coverage the Wikipedia article also cites. Their limit is that neither source offers a formal academic classification of which current within Salafism the film's subjects belong to; that classification is drawn here from a separate, independent academic source, Quintan Wiktorowicz's "Anatomy of the Salafi Movement" (Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 2006), rather than invented.
Facts
Citation
AuthorWikipedia contributors; Maria Flood, Studies in French Cinema
PublisherWikipedia and Taylor and Francis (Studies in French Cinema)
Publication Year2018
The Flood article's own publication year; the Wikipedia half of this combined citation was accessed in 2026. URLhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafistes
Source Typereference
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
A combined citation anchored on Maria Flood's peer reviewed article in Studies in French Cinema alongside Wikipedia's own article; the peer reviewed academic half of the citation is what lifts it above the tier three floor a bare Wikipedia citation would otherwise carry, though the pairing with a general tertiary reference keeps it below the top tier a standalone peer reviewed article would earn. Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names France directly: "the reception of Salafistes (2016) in France," published in Studies in French Cinema and including an interview with co-director Francois Margolin."
This source names Salafism directly: "classification of which current within Salafism the film's subjects belong to; that classification is drawn here from a separate, independent academic source, Quintan Wiktorowicz's "Anatomy of the..."
Claims Backed By This Source (32 claims)
This source backs 32 claims across the atlas. As facts: 19 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 9 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Screen Works, 15 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 7 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Articles, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.