The Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer in Cardiac Bypass Patients, led by Herbert Benson and colleagues and published in the American Heart Journal in 2006, is a large, randomized, peer reviewed clinical trial testing whether prayer by strangers for cardiac surgery patients affected their recovery, using a design where some patients were prayed for without knowing it, some were not prayed for, and a third group was prayed for and told so with certainty. Its strength is a rigorous randomized design, one of the largest and most carefully controlled clinical tests of intercessory prayer's medical effect. Its limit is that the trial found no benefit from being prayed for and, unexpectedly, a higher complication rate among patients who knew with certainty they were being prayed for, a result later discussion has debated the interpretation of, so a claim drawing on it should note the finding was a null result on prayer's medical effect, not evidence against prayer's meaning more broadly.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Herbert Benson and colleagues' STEP trial, published in the American Heart Journal in 2006, is a large randomized peer reviewed clinical trial, one of the most carefully controlled medical tests of intercessory prayer's effect, treated at the top tier. NotesHerbert Benson and colleagues' peer-reviewed clinical study of the therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer on cardiac bypass patients.
Citation
AuthorHerbert Benson and colleagues
PublisherAmerican Heart Journal
Publication Year2006
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 critiqued Here. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Studies, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 critiqued Here, 2 general references.
- Years, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.