David Gordon White is a scholar of South Asian religions, and this academic book, published by University of Chicago Press, examines the Siddha traditions of medieval Indian tantric alchemy and hatha yoga, arguing that these traditions' physical and alchemical practices have been underplayed by earlier scholarship that favored more purely philosophical readings of tantra. Its strength is close engagement with tantric primary sources on the body and physical practice specifically, correcting a historiographic tendency to over-intellectualize tantra at the expense of its ritual and physical dimensions. Its limit is that White's arguments about specific historical connections between alchemy, yoga and Siddha lineages are, by his own account, sometimes necessarily speculative given fragmentary sources, and some of his more specific claims have been debated by other specialists.
Facts
Citation
AuthorDavid Gordon White
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press
Publication Year1996
URLhttps://archive.org/details/alchemicalbodysi0000whit
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
David Gordon White's scholarly study, published by the University of Chicago Press, of medieval Indian Siddha alchemical and yogic traditions and their conception of the body. NotesScholarly study of medieval Indian Siddha alchemical and yogic traditions and their conception of the body.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Chicago directly: "book, published by University of Chicago Press, examines the Siddha traditions of medieval Indian tantric alchemy and hatha yoga, arguing that these traditions' physical and alchemical practices..."
Claims Backed By This Source (94 claims)
This source backs 94 claims across the atlas. As facts: 57 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 open question. As cited relationships: 19 holds, 1 connected. Plus 12 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Open Questions, 24 claims: 18 well-attested, 3 holds, 3 general references.
- Historical Figures, 20 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 open question, 10 holds, 2 general references.
- Denominations, 16 claims: 13 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 12 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
- Doctrines, 10 claims: 6 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Asanas, 2 claims: 2 general references.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.