Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Book of Rites (Li Chi), Sacred Books of the East vols. 27-28

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

James Legge was a pioneering translator of Chinese classical texts, and this Clarendon Press translation of the Li Chi, the Book of Rites, published in the Sacred Books of the East series, remains the standard nineteenth century English rendering still widely cited today. Its strength is real longevity: despite its age it continues to be used because no fully displacing modern translation has achieved the same broad currency, and Legge worked as a serious sinologist rather than a popularizer. Its limit is its age and the state of nineteenth century sinology it reflects, so a claim needing the most current scholarly understanding of a specific passage should be checked against modern Chinese studies scholarship alongside Legge's translation.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by Clarendon Press in the Sacred Books of the East series, James Legge's standard nineteenth century scholarly translation by a serious sinologist, still the field's most widely cited rendering, treated at the top tier as that standard scholarly edition.
Notes
The standard 19th century English translation, still widely cited.
Citation
Author
Translated by James Legge
Publisher
Clarendon Press
Publication Year
1885
Source Type
Critical edition
Claims Backed By This Source (27 claims)

This source backs 27 claims across the atlas. As facts: 22 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Scriptures & Texts, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Rituals, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Virtues, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.