Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Book of Vles: Saga of a Forgery

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Maya Kaganskaya's The Book of Vles, Saga of a Forgery, published in Jews and Jewish Topics in Soviet and East-European Publications in 1986, is a scholarly article establishing the so-called Book of Veles, a purported ancient Slavic religious text, as a modern forgery rather than a genuine ancient document. Its authority rests on Kaganskaya's philological analysis demonstrating the text's actual modern origin, and it is cited by later scholarship on Slavic neopaganism as part of the standard case against the Book of Veles's authenticity. Its limit is that it is one scholarly article making the forgery case rather than a comprehensive history of the text's subsequent reception and continued use within some modern Slavic neopagan movements despite that established forgery finding, which this atlas addresses through its own separate account of that reception.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Maya Kaganskaya's article, published in Jews and Jewish Topics in Soviet and East-European Publications, is treated at the top tier as peer reviewed scholarship establishing the Book of Veles as a modern forgery, cited by later scholarship as part of the standard case against its authenticity.
Notes
Scholarly article establishing the Book of Veles as a modern forgery.
Citation
Author
Maya Kaganskaya
Publisher
Jews and Jewish Topics in Soviet and East-European Publications, no. 4
Publication Year
1986
Source Type
Journal article
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Veles, Deities

This source names Veles directly: "establishing the so-called Book of Veles, a purported ancient Slavic religious text, as a modern forgery rather than a genuine ancient document."

Source The Book of Vles: Saga of a ForgeryMaya Kaganskaya
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)

This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Doctrines, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.