Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Content Analysis of Dreams

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Calvin Hall and Robert Van de Castle's book introduced the coding system still used today for empirical dream-content research, a method for counting and classifying what actually appears in reported dreams, characters, settings and emotions, across large samples rather than interpreting any single dream's symbolism. Its standing rests on that system having become the field's working standard, adopted and applied by later researchers rather than merely proposed once. It is honestly limited in scope: it establishes what themes appear and how often, a genuinely different question from what any dream or symbol means, and this atlas draws on it only for that empirical prevalence data. Use it for how common a given dream theme actually is; it is not a source for symbolic interpretation of dreams, which this literature does not attempt to settle.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
The Hall and Van de Castle study that introduced the coding system still used today for empirical dream-content research; cited for the documented prevalence of dream themes, a different question from symbolic meaning, which this literature does not attempt to settle.
Notes
The standard coding system for empirical dream content research. Cited for prevalence of dream themes, which is what this literature establishes; it does not establish meanings.
Citation
Author
Calvin S. Hall and Robert L. Van de Castle
Publisher
Appleton-Century-Crofts
Publication Year
1966
URL
https://openlibrary.org/books/OL5987448M/The_content_analysis_of_dreams
Source Type
Scholarly work
Claims Backed By This Source (156 claims)

This source backs 156 claims across the atlas. As facts: 99 well-attested. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 53 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Dream Symbols, 119 claims: 71 well-attested, 48 general references.
  • Articles, 28 claims: 20 well-attested, 4 holds, 4 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Practices, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.