The Dating of the Historical Buddha, Die Datierung des historischen Buddha, edited by Heinz Bechert and published in several volumes by Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, collects the papers of an international symposium that brought together specialists in Buddhist chronology, epigraphy and textual history to reassess when the Buddha actually died. The symposium's collective work moved the scholarly center of gravity away from the traditional long chronology toward a date of death placed roughly between 410 and 370 BCE. Its strength is that it represents a genuine convergence of specialists working independently from different kinds of evidence, epigraphic, textual and archaeological, rather than one scholar's argument. Its limit is that a symposium volume presents multiple contributors' distinct calculations and reasoning rather than one settled figure, so a specific date drawn from it should be attributed to the individual paper making that argument.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
The Dating of the Historical Buddha, edited by Heinz Bechert and published by Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, collects an international symposium's peer reviewed papers representing a genuine convergence of specialists working independently from epigraphic, textual and archaeological evidence, treated at the top tier. NotesThe symposium volumes that moved the scholarly centre of gravity toward a date of death between roughly 410 and 370 BCE.
Citation
AuthorHeinz Bechert, editor
PublisherVandenhoeck und Ruprecht
Source TypeEdited volume
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)
This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested, 5 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
- Figures, 5 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 4 claims: 3 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Holidays & Festivals, 3 claims: 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.