Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Delphic Oracle: Its Responses and Operations

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Joseph Fontenrose was a classicist, and this University of California Press book is his systematic academic catalogue and classification of the recorded oracular responses attributed to the Delphic oracle, sorting them by likely historical authenticity against ones that are legendary or literary invention. Its strength is exactly that sceptical sorting method, rather than treating every ancient claim about what the Pythia said as equally reliable, Fontenrose builds a working typology that lets a reader see which responses have some claim to historicity and which are later embellishment or moralizing fiction. Its limit is that this classification necessarily involves Fontenrose's own scholarly judgment on genuinely ambiguous cases, so a specific contested response's classification is one respected scholar's assessment rather than an uncontestable fact.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Joseph Fontenrose's University of California Press catalogue of the recorded Delphic oracle responses, distinguishing historical from legendary ones; the standard sceptical scholarly treatment of what the oracle actually said.
Notes
Catalogues and classifies the recorded Delphic responses and distinguishes historical from legendary and quasi-historical ones. The standard sceptical treatment of what the oracle actually said.
Citation
Author
Joseph Fontenrose
Publisher
University of California Press
Publication Year
1978
URL
https://archive.org/details/delphicoracleits0000font_j9x3
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (56 claims)

This source backs 56 claims across the atlas. As facts: 41 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 10 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 18 claims: 16 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 11 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
  • Organizations, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religious Roles & Titles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Prophecies, 5 claims: 2 scholarly debate, 3 general references.
  • Hymns & Liturgical Texts, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Religious Offices, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Holds

3

Religious Roles & Titles

Sacred Sites

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.