Sources
The Druze
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
Robert Brenton Betts was a scholar and former diplomat with long experience in the Middle East, not a member of the Druze community, and this book was published by an independent university press. It has stood since 1988 as a standard English-language introduction to Druze history, social structure and belief for a non-specialist academic readership, covering the community's eleventh century origins under Hamza ibn Ali, its division between the initiated uqqal and the uninitiated majority, and its historical practice of religious reserve toward outsiders. Being nearly four decades old, it predates more recent Druze history, including the community's role in Lebanon's civil war aftermath and in the Syrian conflict, so a claim about recent events needs a more current source alongside it. This record has not independently traced a documented history of scholarly rebuttal to Betts's specific claims. Use it for the documented history of the Druze faith's origins, structure and doctrinal reserve; it does not, and by the community's own design cannot, describe the closed content of the hikma texts themselves.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Independent university press monograph by a scholar with no membership in the Druze community; nearly four decades old, so recent history needs a newer source alongside it. NotesStandard English-language introduction to Druze history, social structure, belief and the practice of doctrinal reserve.
Citation
AuthorRobert Brenton Betts
PublisherYale University Press
Publication Year1988
Source Typeacademic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (36 claims)
This source backs 36 claims across the atlas. As facts: 27 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 2 connected. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 14 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
- Historical Figures, 10 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Religions, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.