Steven Runciman's The Eastern Schism, A Study of the Papacy and the Eastern Churches During the XIth and XIIth Centuries, published by Oxford University Press in 1955, is a scholarly history examining the gradual estrangement between the Latin and Byzantine churches across the eleventh and twelfth centuries, treating the 1054 events usually cited as the schism as one moment within a much longer, more gradual process of separation. Runciman was a historian of Byzantium whose work drew on both Latin and Greek sources. Its strength is that longer view, resisting the simpler textbook account of a single break in 1054. Its limit is its age: written seventy years ago, it predates significant later archival and ecumenical scholarship on the schism, so a claim resting on Runciman's specific interpretation should be checked against more recent historical work on Byzantine-Latin relations as well.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Steven Runciman's The Eastern Schism, published by Oxford University Press in 1955, is a peer reviewed scholarly history by a historian of Byzantium drawing on both Latin and Greek sources, treated at the top tier. NotesSteven Runciman's scholarly study of the papacy and the Eastern churches in the eleventh and twelfth centuries.
Citation
AuthorSteven Runciman
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication Year1955
Source Typeacademic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)
This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Councils and Synods, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
- Religious Events, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
- Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.