Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Eastern Schism: A Study of the Papacy and the Eastern Churches during the XIth and XIIth Centuries

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Steven Runciman's The Eastern Schism, A Study of the Papacy and the Eastern Churches During the XIth and XIIth Centuries, published by Oxford University Press in 1955, is a scholarly history examining the gradual estrangement between the Latin and Byzantine churches across the eleventh and twelfth centuries, treating the 1054 events usually cited as the schism as one moment within a much longer, more gradual process of separation. Runciman was a historian of Byzantium whose work drew on both Latin and Greek sources. Its strength is that longer view, resisting the simpler textbook account of a single break in 1054. Its limit is its age: written seventy years ago, it predates significant later archival and ecumenical scholarship on the schism, so a claim resting on Runciman's specific interpretation should be checked against more recent historical work on Byzantine-Latin relations as well.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Steven Runciman's The Eastern Schism, published by Oxford University Press in 1955, is a peer reviewed scholarly history by a historian of Byzantium drawing on both Latin and Greek sources, treated at the top tier.
Notes
Steven Runciman's scholarly study of the papacy and the Eastern churches in the eleventh and twelfth centuries.
Citation
Author
Steven Runciman
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1955
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)

This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 12 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Councils and Synods, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religious Events, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Beliefs & Restrictions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.