Alexander Vovin's The End of the Altaic Controversy, published in the Central Asiatic Journal in 2005, is a peer-reviewed review article examining the Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages by Starostin, Dybo and Mudrak, arguing that the shared vocabulary it assembles across Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Korean and Japanese reflects historical language contact rather than common descent from a single Altaic ancestor language. Vovin was a specialist historical linguist in exactly this field, and the article rests on standard peer review and detailed comparative-linguistic argument. It represents the now-dominant position in historical linguistics that a genetic Altaic family is not established, though a handful of specialists continue to argue otherwise.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Alexander Vovin's The End of the Altaic Controversy, published in the Central Asiatic Journal in 2005, the top tier reflecting standard peer review and Vovin's standing as a specialist historical linguist in exactly this field, representing the now-dominant position that a genetic Altaic family is not established, though a handful of specialists continue to argue otherwise. NotesA review article on the Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages of Starostin, Dybo and Mudrak, arguing that the material it assembles is contact rather than inheritance.
Citation
AuthorAlexander Vovin
PublisherCentral Asiatic Journal
Publication Year2005
Source TypeJournal article
Claims Backed By This Source (13 claims)
This source backs 13 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Language Families, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.