Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Gospel of Nicodemus (Acts of Pilate)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Gospel of Nicodemus, also known as the Acts of Pilate, an anonymous apocryphal Passion text usually dated to the fourth or fifth century, is the earliest surviving textual witness to the names Longinus, the soldier traditionally identified as having pierced Christ's side, and Bernice or Veronica, later associated with the veil bearing Christ's imprinted face. Its strength is that it is the actual earliest known source for these specific names, giving a real textual anchor for traditions that later became widespread devotional legend, rather than names whose origin cannot be traced at all. Its limit is that it is an apocryphal text composed centuries after the events it narrates and was never accepted into the biblical canon by any major Christian body, so a claim treating its narrative details as historical fact rather than as later devotional tradition, however textually early relative to other apocrypha, overstates its standing.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
The Gospel of Nicodemus, an anonymous apocryphal Passion text never accepted into the biblical canon by any major Christian body, is an early primary textual witness rather than a canonical or independently reviewed source, hence the middle tier.
Notes
Apocryphal Passion text of the 4th-5th centuries; the earliest witness to the names Longinus and Bernice/Veronica.
Citation
Author
Anonymous
Publication Year
400
Source Type
primary-text
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Longinus, Figures

This source names Longinus directly: "surviving textual witness to the names Longinus, the soldier traditionally identified as having pierced Christ's side, and Bernice or Veronica, later associated with the veil bearing Christ's..."

Veronica, Figures

This source names Veronica directly: "as having pierced Christ's side, and Bernice or Veronica, later associated with the veil bearing Christ's imprinted face."

Claims Backed By This Source (22 claims)

This source backs 22 claims across the atlas. As facts: 17 well-attested. As cited relationships: 2 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Figures, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Myths & Sacred Narratives, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.