Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis, edited by Harris Cooper, Larry V. Hedges and Jeffrey C. Valentine and published by the Russell Sage Foundation in its 2009 second edition, is the standard scholarly reference on meta-analytic method across the social and behavioral sciences, gathering chapters from specialist methodologists on how to statistically combine and evaluate findings across multiple independent studies. Its strength is comprehensiveness and authority, the editors and contributors are established figures in research methodology and the volume is the reference most frequently cited when a study describes its own meta-analytic approach. Its limit, the same as any methodology handbook, is that it establishes how evidence should properly be synthesized rather than supplying any substantive finding itself, so it belongs in the atlas only where a claim needs grounding in what rigorous evidence synthesis requires, not as a source for any specific religious or paranormal claim.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Reliability tier 1: the standard scholarly reference on its method from the Russell Sage Foundation, edited and written by established methodologists, most frequently cited when a study describes its own approach.
Notes
Standard edited handbook of methods for research synthesis and meta-analysis.
Citation
Author
Harris Cooper, Larry V. Hedges and Jeffrey C. Valentine (editors)
Publisher
Russell Sage Foundation
Publication Year
2009
Source Type
Scholarly work
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)

This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Scholarly Disciplines, 4 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.