Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Holy Grail: Imagination and Belief

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Richard Barber's The Holy Grail, Imagination and Belief, published by Harvard University Press in 2004, is a scholarly literary and cultural history of the Grail legend, tracing its development from Robert de Boron's medieval romances through the legend's later attachment to Glastonbury and Joseph of Arimathea. Barber is a recognized medieval historian, and the book rests on standard university press peer review and close reading of the medieval romance sources. It is a history of the legend's literary development, not a claim that any physical Grail relic is authentic, a separate question the legend's own believers and skeptics dispute on other grounds.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
Richard Barber's The Holy Grail, Imagination and Belief, published by Harvard University Press in 2004, the middle tier reflecting standard university press peer review and Barber's standing as a recognized medieval historian tracing the Grail legend's literary development from Robert de Boron's medieval romances through its later attachment to Glastonbury, notwithstanding that it is a history of the legend's literary development and not a claim that any physical Grail relic is authentic, a separate question its own believers and skeptics dispute on other grounds.
Notes
History of the Grail legend, including Robert de Boron and the Glastonbury attachment of Joseph of Arimathea.
Citation
Author
Richard Barber
Publisher
Harvard University Press
Publication Year
2004
Source Type
Scholarly work
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Joseph of Arimathea directly: "later attachment to Glastonbury and Joseph of Arimathea."

Source The Holy Grail: Imagination and BeliefRichard Barber
Claims Backed By This Source (15 claims)

This source backs 15 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Figures, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Sacred Sites, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.