Asbjorn Dyrendal, James R. Lewis and Jesper Aa. Petersen are scholars of new and minority religions, none affiliated with any Satanist or Luciferian organization, and this book was published by an academic press. It is a standard scholarly account of how modern religious Satanism was assembled from folklore, prior occultism and Anton LaVey's own writing, and it treats Luciferianism as a related but distinct current, one that reads Lucifer as a figure of enlightenment and self liberation rather than adopting Satan as an adversarial identity the way LaVeyan and theistic Satanism do. The authors draw on published primary material from the movements they describe rather than from participant observation alone. This record has not independently traced a documented history of scholarly rebuttal to the book's specific claims. Use it for the scholarly basis of distinguishing Luciferianism from Satanism; it is not a source for what any individual self-described Luciferian personally believes, which varies considerably and is documented nowhere in a single authoritative canon.
Facts
Citation
AuthorAsbjorn Dyrendal, James R. Lewis and Jesper Aa. Petersen
PublisherOxford University Press
Publication Year2015
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Academic press monograph by three scholars of new and minority religions, none affiliated with any Satanist or Luciferian organization. NotesStandard scholarly account of the assembly of modern religious Satanism and its scholarly distinction from Luciferianism.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Lucifer directly: "none affiliated with any Satanist or Luciferian organization, and this book was published by an academic press."
Satan, Figures This source names Satan directly: "religions, none affiliated with any Satanist or Luciferian organization, and this book was published by an academic press."
Claims Backed By This Source (21 claims)
This source backs 21 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
- Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Religions, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 open question, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.