Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Literature of Ancient Sumer

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Jeremy Black, Graham Cunningham, Eleanor Robson and Gabor Zolyomi are Assyriologists and Sumerologists, and this academic book, published by Oxford University Press, surveys the surviving literature of ancient Sumer in translation, drawing on the same cuneiform textual corpus maintained by the Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature project the authors worked on. Its strength is direct grounding in primary cuneiform sources translated by specialists actively working on that literature, rather than secondhand retellings. Its limit is that Sumerian literary texts often survive in fragmentary and sometimes conflicting versions across different tablets, and the translations here represent the editors' best scholarly reconstruction rather than a single undisputed original text.

Facts
Citation
Author
Jeremy Black, Graham Cunningham, Eleanor Robson and Gabor Zolyomi
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
2004
URL
https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-literature-of-ancient-sumer-9780199296330
Source Type
Critical translation with scholarly introduction
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A scholarly critical translation, published by Oxford University Press, of Sumerian literary texts including the Exaltation of Inanna and the hymn to Ninkasi, with discussion of the Enheduanna attribution.
Notes
Translations of Sumerian literary texts including the Exaltation of Inanna and the hymn to Ninkasi, with discussion of the Enheduanna attribution.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Sumerians, Cultures

This source names Sumerians directly: "Jeremy Black, Graham Cunningham, Eleanor Robson and Gabor Zolyomi are Assyriologists and Sumerologists, and this academic book, published by Oxford University Press, surveys the surviving literature..."

Source The Literature of Ancient SumerJeremy Black, Graham Cunningham, Eleanor Robson and Gabor Zolyomi
Claims Backed By This Source (95 claims)

This source backs 95 claims across the atlas. As facts: 64 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 15 holds. Plus 15 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Deities, 31 claims: 22 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 3 holds, 5 general references.
  • Hymns & Liturgical Texts, 24 claims: 17 well-attested, 4 holds, 3 general references.
  • Articles, 15 claims: 13 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Cultures, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 3 holds, 1 general references.
  • Sacred Sites, 4 claims: 2 holds, 2 general references.
  • Languages, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Regions, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Religious Symbols, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1

Deities

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.