Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Man-Eating Myth: Anthropology and Anthropophagy

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

William Arens's The Man-Eating Myth, Anthropology and Anthropophagy, published by Oxford University Press in 1979, argues that anthropology, despite widespread belief to the contrary, has no satisfactory firsthand eyewitness account of institutionalized, socially sanctioned cannibalism anywhere, and that the accusation is characteristically made about a neighboring or subject people rather than directly observed. Its strength is that Arens forces the field to distinguish what was actually witnessed from what was reported secondhand or assumed, a genuinely useful discipline regardless of where the argument ultimately lands. Its limit is that the book was heavily criticized on its own publication, with anthropologists citing specific cases they argued did meet Arens's evidentiary standard, and that criticism is part of the book's own scholarly record rather than a settled refutation on either side, so it should be read as one strong position within a live and unresolved anthropological argument, not as the field's final word.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
2
William Arens's The Man-Eating Myth, published by Oxford University Press in 1979, was heavily criticized on publication with anthropologists citing counterexamples, so it stands as one contested position rather than settled scholarship, hence the middle tier.
Notes
Argues that anthropology has no satisfactory first-hand account of socially approved cannibalism, and that the charge is characteristically made about a neighbouring or subject people rather than observed. Heavily criticised, and the criticism is part of the record.
Citation
Author
William Arens
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
1979
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)

This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 11 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Studies, 7 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Years, 2 claims: 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.