Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Mishnah: A New Translation

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The Mishnah is the foundational rabbinic legal text compiled around 200 CE, and this Yale University Press volume is Jacob Neusner's scholarly English translation of it, one of the standard complete English renderings used in academic study of rabbinic Judaism. Its strength is that Neusner was an unusually prolific and influential translator and scholar of rabbinic literature, and this translation remains widely used specifically because it renders the entire Mishnah in a consistent, systematic English style suited to close academic study. Its limit is that Neusner's own translation choices and organizational commentary reflect his particular scholarly interpretive approach to rabbinic literature, one respected but not universally shared among Talmudists, so a claim resting on a specific fine point of translation may benefit from checking against another standard translation alongside this one.

Facts
Citation
Author
Jacob Neusner, trans.
Publisher
Yale University Press
Publication Year
1988
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Jacob Neusner's scholarly translation of the Mishnah from a university press.
Notes
Jacob Neusner's scholarly translation of the Mishnah.
Claims Backed By This Source (171 claims)

This source backs 171 claims across the atlas. As facts: 112 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 2 open question. As cited relationships: 22 holds, 10 connected. Plus 21 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Virtues, 59 claims: 32 well-attested, 4 scholarly debate, 14 holds, 5 connected, 4 general references.
  • Articles, 43 claims: 31 well-attested, 5 connected, 7 general references.
  • Open Questions, 20 claims: 14 well-attested, 3 holds, 3 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 17 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 open question, 2 holds, 3 general references.
  • Scripture Portions, 17 claims: 11 well-attested, 3 holds, 3 general references.
  • Scriptures & Texts, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.

Scholarly debate

4

Open question

2

Historical Figures

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.