Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Nag Hammadi Story

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

James M. Robinson's The Nag Hammadi Story, published by Brill in 2014, is the definitive scholarly account of the 1945 discovery of the Nag Hammadi codices in Egypt and the decades long, often fraught process by which the Gnostic texts they contained reached publication, written by the scholar who personally led the international committee that oversaw the codices' translation. Its strength is Robinson's own direct involvement, giving the account firsthand knowledge of the antiquities market dealings, academic disputes and delays that shaped when and how the world actually saw these texts, detail no outside historian could reconstruct as completely. Its limit is exactly that closeness, Robinson was an active participant in the events and disputes he narrates, including disagreements with other scholars over access and credit, so a claim resting on a contested point of the story's own telling benefits from checking it against other participants' independent accounts of the same events.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
James M. Robinson's The Nag Hammadi Story, published by Brill in 2014, is the definitive scholarly account written by the scholar who personally led the international committee overseeing the codices' translation, treated at the top tier for that firsthand knowledge, notwithstanding that Robinson was himself an active participant in the disputes he narrates.
Notes
James Robinson's account of the discovery of the Nag Hammadi codices.
Citation
Author
James M. Robinson
Publisher
Brill
Publication Year
2014
Source Type
book
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Egypt, Countries

This source names Egypt directly: "of the Nag Hammadi codices in Egypt and the decades long, often fraught process by which the Gnostic texts they contained reached publication, written by the scholar who personally led the..."

Source The Nag Hammadi StoryJames M. Robinson
Claims Backed By This Source (19 claims)

This source backs 19 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 3 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Textual Witnesses, 5 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
  • Custodians & Museums, 3 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.