First Corinthians chapter fifteen is Paul's own extended argument for the reality of Jesus's bodily resurrection and its consequence for believers, and it is cited here as the primary text itself, the earliest written account of resurrection belief in the New Testament corpus and a central proof text within Christian theology across nearly every tradition. As scripture rather than as scholarship, its authority for a reader depends entirely on the confessional or historical-critical framework applied to it: within Christian traditions it functions as a normative theological claim, while historical-critical scholarship reads it primarily as evidence for what the earliest Christian communities believed and taught within roughly two decades of the crucifixion, a distinct and more modest claim than the passage's own theological one. Both readings are legitimate uses of the same text for different purposes.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
First Corinthians chapter fifteen is Paul's own primary text, the earliest written account of resurrection belief in the New Testament corpus, treated at the top tier as that primary source. NotesVerses 3 to 8 quote a creedal formula about the resurrection appearances that most scholars date to within a few years of the crucifixion, earlier than the letter itself.
Citation
AuthorPaul the Apostle
Source Typeprimary-scripture
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)
This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. Plus 4 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 5 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Sources, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
- Myths & Sacred Narratives, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Religious Events, 3 claims: 2 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Cities, 1 claims: 1 general references.
Well-attested
13Myths & Sacred Narratives
General References
4Myths & Sacred Narratives
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.