Margaret Sax, Jane M. Walsh, Ian C. Freestone, Andrew H. Bevan and Nigel D. Meeks are researchers in archaeological science, and this peer reviewed Journal of Archaeological Science article reports their scanning electron microscope tool mark analysis and quartz source study of the British Museum and Smithsonian crystal skulls purportedly of pre-Columbian Mexican origin. Its strength is that it is peer reviewed physical analysis with reproducible methods, and it concludes the skulls were manufactured with modern rotary tools, not by pre-Columbian craft. Its limit is that it examines these two specific specimens, so a claim about a different crystal skull's authenticity needs its own independent physical analysis rather than an extension of this finding.
Facts
Citation
AuthorMargaret Sax, Jane M. Walsh, Ian C. Freestone, Andrew H. Bevan, Nigel D. Meeks
PublisherJournal of Archaeological Science
Publication Year2008
URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2008.06.007
Source Typepeer-reviewed article
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Published in the peer reviewed Journal of Archaeological Science, Sax, Walsh, Freestone, Bevan and Meeks' report of reproducible scanning electron microscope tool mark analysis, treated at the top tier as peer reviewed physical science. NotesSEM tool-mark and quartz-source analysis of the British Museum and Smithsonian skulls; concludes modern rotary-tool manufacture.
Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)
This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 5 holds. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Artifacts & Relics, 10 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 5 holds, 1 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Custodians & Museums, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.