Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Oxford Companion to the Book

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

This is a standard scholarly reference on the history of the book, with entries from named specialists in manuscript and print culture covering how texts were physically produced and transmitted across periods and traditions worldwide, edited by Michael Suarez and H. R. Woudhuysen. That named specialist contributor structure, the same model that gives an edited scholarly reference its real authority, is why this atlas relies on it for questions of textual transmission specifically. Use it for established facts about the manuscript or print history of a specific text, how it was physically transmitted rather than what it says; a claim about a text's religious content or doctrine needs a source addressing that content directly, since this reference is about the book as a physical and historical object.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A standard scholarly reference on the history of the book, manuscript and print culture worldwide, published by Oxford University Press; use for the manuscript or print history of a specific text, not for that text's religious content.
Notes
Standard scholarly reference on the history of the book, manuscript and print culture worldwide, covering production, transmission and the physical form of texts across periods and traditions. Use for established facts about the manuscript or print history of a specific text or tradition of textual transmission; a book-history reference, not a source on a text's religious content.
Citation
Author
Michael F. Suarez and H. R. Woudhuysen (editors)
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publication Year
2010
Source Type
academic reference
Claims Backed By This Source (97 claims)

This source backs 97 claims across the atlas. As facts: 67 well-attested. As cited relationships: 10 holds. Plus 20 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 50 claims: 30 well-attested, 10 holds, 10 general references.
  • Scholarly Disciplines, 40 claims: 30 well-attested, 10 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.