Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Quest for the Phoenix: Spiritual Alchemy and Rosicrucianism in the Work of Count Michael Maier

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Hereward Tilton's The Quest for the Phoenix, Spiritual Alchemy and Rosicrucianism in the Work of Count Michael Maier, published by Walter de Gruyter in 2003, is the standard scholarly study of the seventeenth century alchemist and physician Michael Maier, correcting a long tradition of romantic misreporting about his life and directly examining his actual alchemical and Rosicrucian writings rather than the legends that accumulated around him. Its strength is that corrective, source based approach, going back to Maier's own texts to establish what he actually wrote and believed against later embellishment. Its limit is that Maier's own alchemical writing is itself deliberately symbolic and esoteric, written to be read on multiple levels by design, so even a careful scholarly study cannot fully settle what Maier privately believed his own symbolism meant, and a claim asserting a single definitive interpretation of a specific Maier text should be read as Tilton's own informed reading rather than as Maier's stated intent.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Hereward Tilton's The Quest for the Phoenix, published by the academic press Walter de Gruyter in 2003, is the standard scholarly study of Michael Maier's alchemical writing, treated at the top tier as a source-based corrective to earlier romantic misreporting about Maier.
Notes
The standard scholarly study of Maier, correcting a long tradition of romantic misreporting about him.
Citation
Author
Hereward Tilton
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter
Publication Year
2003
Source Type
academic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)

This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Historical Figures, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.