Ibn Miskawayh was a tenth century Muslim philosopher, and the Tahdhib al-Akhlaq, in Constantine K. Zurayk's English translation published by the American University of Beirut, is his own foundational ethical treatise reworking the Aristotelian doctrine of the virtuous mean and the four cardinal virtues within an Islamic account of the soul's perfection. As Ibn Miskawayh's own primary text, in a recognized scholarly translation, it is the correct source for the founding statement of the philosophical akhlaq genre in his own argument. Its limit is that it presents one philosopher's own synthesis, so a claim about how later akhlaq writers modified or departed from his framework needs a source addressing that later tradition.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Constantine K. Zurayk's English translation published by the American University of Beirut, Ibn Miskawayh's own foundational primary ethical treatise in a recognized scholarly translation, treated at the top tier as that primary text in standard scholarly translation. NotesIbn Miskawayh's tenth century Arabic ethical treatise, in Constantine K. Zurayk's English translation. Reworks the Aristotelian doctrine of the virtuous mean and the four cardinal virtues within an Islamic account of the soul's perfection; the founding text of the philosophical akhlaq genre.
Citation
AuthorIbn Miskawayh, translated by Constantine K. Zurayk
PublisherAmerican University of Beirut
Publication Year1968
Source Typeprimary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (24 claims)
This source backs 24 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 2 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 2 general references.
- Doctrines, 8 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 connected, 1 general references.
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.