Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Root Causes of Sudan's Civil Wars (Johnson)

Douglas H. Johnson, James Currey / Indiana University Press, 2003

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Douglas H. Johnson's history of Sudan's First and Second Civil Wars, published by James Currey and Indiana University Press in 2003. Johnson, a historian of Sudan, argues that the wars' deeper and more durable causes were the political and economic marginalization of Sudan's peripheries, especially the south, by successive governments centered in Khartoum, a center-periphery dynamic that predates and outlasted any single government's specific religious policy. On this reading the 1983 imposition of Sharia law that reopened the war functioned as a proximate trigger and a potent unifying grievance rather than the war's root cause. Its strength is a wide comparative view across both wars and multiple governments in Khartoum. Its limit is that, in de-emphasizing religion as a root cause, it argues one identifiable side of a live debate over how central religious identity was to the conflict.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
A named historian of Sudan's standard scholarly account of both civil wars' causes, published by academic presses, though it argues one identifiable side of the debate over how central religion was to the conflict.
Notes
Cited for the Second Sudanese Civil War's dates, principal parties, outcome, and the political/center-periphery reading of its religious dimension.
Citation
Author
Douglas H. Johnson
Publisher
James Currey / Indiana University Press
Publication Year
2003
Source Type
academic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

This source names Indiana directly: "Wars, published by James Currey and Indiana University Press in 2003."

Sudan, Countries

This source names Sudan directly: "Johnson's history of Sudan's First and Second Civil Wars, published by James Currey and Indiana University Press in 2003."

Claims Backed By This Source (25 claims)

This source backs 25 claims across the atlas. As facts: 18 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 3 holds, 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Sources, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 2 holds.
  • Wars & Conflicts, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 7 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.