Frances A. Yates was a historian of Renaissance esotericism, and this Routledge and Kegan Paul book is her classic academic study of the seventeenth century Rosicrucian manifestos and the intellectual and political climate in central Europe that produced them. Its strength, and the reason it remains a standard reference decades after publication, is Yates's deep grounding in the Renaissance hermetic and Paracelsian sources that fed into the manifestos, read against the specific political crisis of the Bohemian Palatinate. Its limit, and this is openly noted on the source record itself, is that Yates's wider thesis, connecting Rosicrucianism to a broad continental intellectual movement, has since been disputed by later scholars who read the evidence for that wider connection as thinner than she argued, so her larger claims should be weighed against that later critical literature.
Facts
Citation
AuthorFrances A. Yates
PublisherRoutledge and Kegan Paul
Publication Year1972
URLhttps://archive.org/details/rosicrucianenlig0000yate
Source Typeacademic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Frances Yates's classic account of the Rosicrucian manifestos and their political setting; its broader historical thesis has been disputed by later scholars, but the underlying documentary account remains standard. NotesThe classic account of the manifestos and their political setting; its wider thesis is disputed.
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Europe directly: "and political climate in central Europe that produced them."
Claims Backed By This Source (53 claims)
This source backs 53 claims across the atlas. As facts: 39 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 4 holds. Plus 6 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Historical Figures, 20 claims: 14 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 popular myth - corrected, 3 general references.
- Secret Societies, 14 claims: 10 well-attested, 2 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
- Articles, 6 claims: 6 well-attested.
- Figures, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 general references.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.