The Shapira Scrolls, Authentic or Forged, published by the Biblical Archaeology Society in Biblical Archaeology Review in 2021, summarizes the 1883 forgery verdict against dealer Moses Shapira's purported ancient Deuteronomy manuscript, its revival as a live scholarly question following a 2021 reexamination, and the opposing analyses of scholars Idan Dershowitz and Matthieu Richelle on the manuscript's authenticity. Its strength is that Biblical Archaeology Review presents both sides of a genuinely reopened scholarly dispute rather than treating the 1883 verdict as beyond question, giving space to the case for authenticity as well as the case against it. Its limit is that the manuscript itself no longer survives to be tested directly, having been lost after Shapira's death, so the entire modern debate works from copies, drawings and secondhand descriptions rather than the physical object, a limit no source on this question, including this one, can overcome.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
Biblical Archaeology Review, published by the Biblical Archaeology Society, is a specialist popular-academic magazine rather than a peer reviewed journal, the middle tier reflecting an editorial standard that fairly airs a genuinely reopened scholarly dispute without itself being the peer reviewed forum where that dispute is adjudicated. NotesSummarises the 1883 forgery verdict, the 2021 revival, and the opposing analyses of Hendel and Richelle.
Citation
AuthorBiblical Archaeology Society
PublisherBiblical Archaeology Review
Publication Year2021
URLhttps://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/daily/biblical-topics/hebrew-bible/the-shapira-scrolls-authentic-or-forged/
Source Typemagazine
Claims Backed By This Source (16 claims)
This source backs 16 claims across the atlas. As facts: 14 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 8 claims: 8 well-attested.
- Artifacts & Relics, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 general references.
- Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.