Sources
The Soul of Things
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
The Soul of Things, by William Denton and Elizabeth M. F. Denton, published by Walker, Wise and Company in 1863, is the primary nineteenth century text recording the Dentons' geological-specimen reading experiments, an extension of Joseph Rodes Buchanan's earlier psychometry claims into geology and paleontology. As a primary source, it is authoritative for what the Dentons themselves claimed to observe and how they described their method, which is the fact this atlas draws on it for. Its claims of psychically reading the history of mineral specimens were never independently replicated under controlled conditions and have no standing in modern science; cite it for the historical claim, not as evidence the phenomenon is real.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier2
William Denton and Elizabeth M. F. Denton's The Soul of Things, published by Walker, Wise and Company in 1863, the middle tier reflecting that as a primary source it is authoritative for what the Dentons themselves claimed to observe in their geological specimen reading experiments and how they described their method, notwithstanding that their claims were never independently replicated under controlled conditions and have no standing in modern science, cited for the historical claim rather than as evidence the phenomenon is real. NotesDenton's geological-specimen reading experiments extending Buchanan's psychometry.
Citation
AuthorWilliam Denton, Elizabeth M. F. Denton
PublisherWalker, Wise and Company
Publication Year1863
Source Typeprimary-text
Claims Backed By This Source (12 claims)
This source backs 12 claims across the atlas. As facts: 9 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 1 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Psi Phenomena, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 popular myth - corrected, 1 holds, 1 general references.
- Articles, 1 claims: 1 well-attested.
Popular myth - corrected
1Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.