Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Wilferd Madelung is a scholar of early Islamic history, and this academic book, published by Cambridge University Press, is one of the standard scholarly treatments of the succession crisis after Muhammad's death that led to the Sunni-Shia division, working from the earliest surviving Arabic historical and biographical sources. Its strength is that Madelung reconstructs the succession dispute by weighing early sources against each other rather than simply following the later Sunni historical tradition, which had previously been the default framework even in Western scholarship, giving real weight to material that supports the historical case for Ali's succession claim. Its limit is that this is one scholar's considered reconstruction of a deeply contested and religiously significant historical question, and it should be read as a serious scholarly argument rather than as settling the theological dispute itself.

Facts
Citation
Author
Wilferd Madelung
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
1997
URL
https://archive.org/details/successiontomuam0000made
Source Type
academic monograph
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Wilferd Madelung's standard critical scholarly study of the succession crises of the Rashidun period, including the caliphate of Uthman and the grievances that led to his murder.
Notes
The standard critical study of the succession crises of the Rashidun period, including the caliphate of Uthman, his Umayyad appointments, and the grievances that led to his murder and the first fitna.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Sunni, Denominations

This source names Sunni directly: "after Muhammad's death that led to the Sunni-Shia division, working from the earliest surviving Arabic historical and biographical sources."

Claims Backed By This Source (105 claims)

This source backs 105 claims across the atlas. As facts: 50 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 22 holds, 4 connected, 2 rejected Here. Plus 23 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Articles, 27 claims: 18 well-attested, 1 holds, 1 connected, 7 general references.
  • Councils and Synods, 25 claims: 11 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 8 holds, 2 connected, 2 general references.
  • Figures, 11 claims: 4 well-attested, 3 holds, 4 general references.
  • Schools of Religious Law, 10 claims: 4 holds, 1 rejected Here, 5 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Open Questions, 8 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Religious Events, 7 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 open question, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Denominations, 4 claims: 1 holds, 1 rejected Here, 2 general references.
  • Empires & Polities, 4 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 2 holds, 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

3

Empires & Polities

Open question

1

Religious Events

Rejected Here

2

Denominations

Schools of Religious Law

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.