Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Taoist Canon: A Historical Companion to the Daozang

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Kristofer Schipper and Franciscus Verellen edited this University of Chicago Press reference work, a three volume scholarly companion describing and dating every text contained in the Zhengtong Daozang, the 1445 Ming dynasty Taoist canon, and its 1607 supplement. Its strength is comprehensiveness achieved through genuine specialist collaboration, a team of Taoist studies scholars worked through the entire canon text by text, making it the standard reference for identifying and dating any individual work within this enormous corpus. Its limit is that it is a bibliographic and historical companion to the canon's texts, describing what each text is and when it was likely composed, rather than a translation or exposition of any one text's actual content, which a reader wanting the substance of a specific scripture needs to seek separately.

Facts
Citation
Author
Kristofer Schipper and Franciscus Verellen (eds.)
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Publication Year
2004
URL
https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo3533948.html
Source Type
Edited volume
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Kristofer Schipper and Franciscus Verellen's edited University of Chicago Press companion describing and dating every text in the Taoist canon, the reference work for the field.
Notes
Three volumes describing and dating every text in the Zhengtong Daozang of 1445 and its 1607 supplement. The reference work for the Taoist canon.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Chicago, Cities

This source names Chicago directly: "Verellen edited this University of Chicago Press reference work, a three volume scholarly companion describing and dating every text contained in the Zhengtong Daozang, the 1445 Ming dynasty Taoist..."

Source The Taoist Canon: A Historical Companion to the DaozangKristofer Schipper and Franciscus Verellen (eds.)
Claims Backed By This Source (49 claims)

This source backs 49 claims across the atlas. As facts: 27 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 8 holds, 2 held Differently. Plus 11 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Scriptures & Texts, 12 claims: 7 well-attested, 4 holds, 1 general references.
  • Religious Events, 9 claims: 6 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 9 claims: 8 well-attested, 1 holds.
  • Articles, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Denominations, 4 claims: 2 held Differently, 2 general references.
  • Prayers, 4 claims: 1 well-attested, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Esoteric Texts, 3 claims: 1 scholarly debate, 2 general references.
  • Historical Figures, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Sacred Sound, 1 claims: 1 general references.
  • Spread Events, 1 claims: 1 general references.

Scholarly debate

1
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.