Divinity Atlas

Sacred Correspondences
Sources

The Vedanga Jyotisha of Lagadha, in its Rigveda and Yajurveda Recensions

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

T. S. Kuppanna Sastry produced this critical edition and English translation, published by the Indian National Science Academy, of the Vedanga Jyotisha of Lagadha in both its Rigveda and Yajurveda recensions, with commentary addressing the text's disputed dating. As the standard modern critical edition of this foundational ancient Indian astronomical text, verified as a genuine and still cited scholarly publication, it is the correct source for the text's actual content and Kuppanna Sastry's own reasoned treatment of its chronology. Its limit is that the dating question it addresses remains genuinely debated among scholars, so a claim asserting a single settled date for the text should be checked against the wider scholarly discussion this edition itself engages.

Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier
1
Published by the Indian National Science Academy, a national scholarly academy, as a critical edition and translation of an ancient astronomical text, peer reviewed institutional scholarship.
Notes
Standard modern critical edition and English translation, with both recensions and commentary on the dating question.
Citation
Author
Translated and critically edited by T. S. Kuppanna Sastry
Publisher
Indian National Science Academy
Publication Year
1985
Source Type
Critical edition
Claims Backed By This Source (33 claims)

This source backs 33 claims across the atlas. As facts: 23 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 open question. As cited relationships: 2 holds, 1 connected. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Esoteric Texts, 13 claims: 6 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate, 1 open question, 2 holds, 1 general references.
  • Open Questions, 9 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 connected, 1 general references.
  • Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
  • Articles, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
  • Numbers, 2 claims: 1 well-attested, 1 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.