Barend J. ter Haar's The White Lotus Teachings in Chinese Religious History is a major scholarly revisionist study arguing that the White Lotus, long treated by both Chinese officialdom and earlier Western scholarship as a single continuous heterodox rebel tradition, was in fact largely a label imposed by suspicious authorities onto a shifting and much more diverse range of popular religious groups. Its authority rests on close archival work with Chinese primary sources across several centuries, and the book substantially reshaped how specialists in Chinese religion now approach the category. Because it directly overturns an older historiographical consensus, later scholars have continued to test and in places refine ter Haar's own boundaries for which groups the corrective properly applies to.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Barend J. ter Haar's study, published by the major academic press E. J. Brill, is a peer reviewed revisionist study built on close archival work with Chinese primary sources, treated at the top tier. NotesAcademic study of the White Lotus teachings and their place in Chinese religious history.
Citation
AuthorBarend J. ter Haar
PublisherE. J. Brill, Leiden
Publication Year1992
Source Typeacademic monograph
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)
This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 15 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Sources, 7 claims: 7 well-attested.
- Secret Societies, 6 claims: 5 well-attested, 1 general references.
- Articles, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.
- Denominations, 2 claims: 1 connected, 1 general references.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.