Francis Clooney's is a scholarly monograph examining Jaimini's Purva Mimamsa Sutra on its own interpretive terms, arguing that the commentarial tradition beginning with Sabara updated and reworked Jaimini's original argument rather than simply transmitting it, a specific historical-critical claim about the school's own commentarial history. Clooney is an established scholar of comparative theology with a specific record in Mimamsa studies. This record has not independently traced later scholarly response to Clooney's specific reading of the relationship between Jaimini and his commentators. Use it for Jaimini's Mimamsa Sutra, its argument against a required creator god, and the interpretive method the school built around Vedic ritual injunction.
Facts
Assessment
Reliability Tier1
Francis X. Clooney's Thinking Ritually, published through the De Nobili Research Library at the Institut fur Indologie der Universitat Wien, is a scholarly monograph by a recognized comparative theologian and Sanskritist, treated at the top tier as specialist academic publishing. NotesFrancis X. Clooney, Thinking Ritually: Rediscovering the Purva Mimamsa of Jaimini, Publications of the De Nobili Research Library volume 17, Institut fur Indologie der Universitat Wien, Vienna, 1990. Added because no library volume of the Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies covers Purva Mimamsa. Use for Jaimini's philosophy and the Mimamsa school's legacy.
Citation
AuthorFrancis X. Clooney
PublisherDe Nobili Research Library, Institut fur Indologie der Universitat Wien
Publication Year1990
Source Typeacademic monograph
Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
This source names Jaimini directly: "is a scholarly monograph examining Jaimini's Purva Mimamsa Sutra on its own interpretive terms, arguing that the commentarial tradition beginning with Sabara updated and reworked Jaimini's original..."
Claims Backed By This Source (18 claims)
This source backs 18 claims across the atlas. As facts: 13 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 2 connected. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Articles, 10 claims: 6 well-attested, 2 connected, 2 general references.
- Sources, 8 claims: 7 well-attested, 1 holds.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.